Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable moustaches in art and fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid 64 19:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable moustaches in art and fiction[edit]

Delete - Stachecruft. Completely unencyclopedic. Otto4711 02:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete though some of it could be merged back into moustache. I do however, think that the use of cruft as a reason for deletion is inappropriate. There are better ways to express the problem. FrozenPurpleCube 02:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete you have GOT to be kidding. JuJube 03:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We deleted Category:People with facial hair, and as a poorly annotated list, this article provides nothing more. Additionally, the articles for individual styles of moustaches already list famous persons with such a type of moustache. This is unnecessary duplication, and with less value due to being less well-categorised. --Sopoforic 04:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unencyclopedic list. JIP | Talk 06:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 07:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with merge of some info into the moustache article. And now off to nominate Image:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg for the 4/1/07 "picture of the day ;) SkierRMH,07:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge any useful (not ridden with OR and POV) content into Moustache. --Dweller 12:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic, WP:OR, nonsense. Terence Ong 13:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - This is just one of more than 150+ lists of fictional objects / people on Wikipedia. See here. Why is this list different from any other? They should all stay as they provide useful summaries of the treatment of the subject by artists and writers through history and across cultures. Lumos3 15:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Trivia sections, like moustaches, can be either cut off or trimmed. This one should have been trimmed. Gazpacho 16:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Bucketsofg 19:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unencyclopedic trivia. No indication of what is a "notable" mustache. It is a list with questionable basis for inclusion and of possibly indeterminate length. Just because other equally bad lists might exist does not justify the existence of this list. Agent 86 20:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Uncyclopedic. —dima/s-ko/ 20:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just trivia ~ Joe Jklin (T C) 21:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too subjective (against the recommendations of WP:LIST. Chovain^(t|c) 22:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.