Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of motorcycles with sidecars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of motorcycles with sidecars

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is inherently useless - by definition, *any* motorcycle can have a sidecar fitted, all the way from Vespa to Goldwing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there is already an article Sidecar, which covers the topic in better detail. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too trivial an article type. Previous editor RfD evaluations were sound.Knox490 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 22:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Sidecar. The list aspect isn't very useful, for reasons stated (many bikes can have a sidecar fitted, and the list doesn't provide any useful information about car design, or have clear inclusion criteria). But much of this article is sourced info on sidecar design which isn't covered in the main sidecar article. Colapeninsula (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original nominator. I just don't think there's enough in the article to warrant moving across - apart from a couple of images perhaps. The two sections Two side-cars with motorcycle in the middle is poorly sourced, and Side-cars that seat two passengers treats the concept as a one-off, despite a quick google search showing that there are several manufacturers - Watsonian, Hannigan, Kenna, etc, who make 2 seat sidecars.

Additionally, I'm not sure what was meant by "clearer consensus" in re-listing it - there were two commentators, both whom suggested Delete - that seems pretty clear to me? Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.