Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-subscribers gained on YouTube channels in 24 hours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of most-subscribers gained on YouTube channels in 24 hours[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources for this article are terrible, they are Tweets and links to YouTube channels with no validation of subscriber growth. It's not clear that "Statsheep" provides reliable statistics over time. YouTube has existed for 15 years and it's unlikely that there are any historical sources charting this type of statistic across the board. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A simple one-liner for the entry at the top of the list can be mentioned in the main YouTube article. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I see this list as a pain to maintain, especially when there are no reliable sources in the first place. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research. Ajf773 (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete overall trivial and fails WP:NOT. NavjotSR (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to the abundance of non reliable sources. Captain Galaxy (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:TRIVIA. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any words to say in favour but how about creating a new wiki page as Youtube Records? 11:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC) (moving post by Social XD)
Delete as not maintainable, not credibly reported, and not notable. --Lockley (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete You can generate the information of social blaze. You don't need an article for it. Also there is no context for attached to it. scope_creep^Talk 08:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.