Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of monuments and memorials of Joseph Smith, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Joseph Smith, Jr.. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of monuments and memorials of Joseph Smith, Jr.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge with Joseph Smith, Jr. and then delete The page is not notable in its own right. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close merging does not require AfD, and Wikipedia likes preserving edit history, so the list-page-name should be left around as attribution history. After you redirect it, it will serve as a redirect, since the article it points to will contain the list that the redirect is about. I do understand that there's not much attribution history to be concerned with, but the page name could still reasonably search as a section link. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 02:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I suggested deletion because the article name is not going to be a likely search string. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge It belongs on the bottom of that article. That is where people would expect to find it. It only has 4 items, so no problem merging. Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge It should be mentioned in the article about Joseph Smith, Jr., but it's not long enough for it's own article, and too unlikely a search term to be a redirect. Perhaps the edit history could be preserved by moving the title to "Joseph Smith, Jr. memorials" and then doing a redirect. Mandsford (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per above Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 18:15, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I created this article because it was awkward to include this incomplete list at the bottom of the Joseph Smith, Jr. article. Despite this, I have no strong objections to its deletion as its own article, and have temporarily userfied the content. We'll find a better way to include this material in WP somewhere. The article's edit history was only me cut-pasting from the JSJr. article, and is not worth preserving. ...comments? ~BF izz 14:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the creation entirely novel list topics without a verifiable definition contravenes the prohibition on original research as illustrated by WP:MADEUP. As far as I can see, this list, or anything like it, has not be been published anywhere except within Wikipedia, so there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own idea, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with content policy. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 12:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.