Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Chuck characters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor Chuck characters[edit]

List of minor Chuck characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per the lead, Characters on this list are those that do not contribute significantly to the plots of more than two episodes, and who are not associated with Buy More, Fulcrum, the Ring, or Volkoff Industries. (which are character lists as well, in addition to List of Chuck characters). This is basically indiscriminate WP:PLOT. – sgeureka tc 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka tc 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka tc 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka tc 16:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hence why it's called "Minor Chuck Characters." -- Ambaryer (talk) 02:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - "Minor" says it all, it's too minor and non-notable for Wikipedia and is entirely plot summary/sourced to the show. I am sure the Chuck Wikia covers it better.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Appearing in only one or two episodes is not a recipe for notability. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This uncontrolled multiplication of fictional articles has gone insane.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with above comments list of minor characters sourced only to fictional sources is non-notable and non-encyclopedic Dartslilly (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.