Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of maps in Battlefield 2 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (aeropagitica) 16:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of maps in Battlefield 2[edit]
- List of maps in Battlefield 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Looking back at the first nomination, I have no idea how so many people could actually think of keeping this gamecruft. Aside from the fact that the text appears to be copyrighted, the article itself only documents an aspect of gameplay which can easily be discussed summary style in the main article: the very definition of a game guide. The original nomination also cited Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of maps in Company of Heroes and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of multiplayer maps in Halo 2 as precedent for deletion. If that isn't enough to convince you, try to remember some of Wikipedia's major tenets: WP:V, WP:NOT and WP:NOR Axem Titanium 20:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V, WP:NOT - as it currently stands the tone of this article is all wrong and if even it was re-written from scratch, I don't see any real world or cultural impact that requires more than 3 or 4 lines on the main article. --Charlesknight 12:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 12:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Copy and paste from the game's documentation.--Zxcvbnm 23:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 08:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. The fact that the map summaries are a direct copy from the in-game loading screens would make this a copyvio page, I believe. Green451 03:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.