Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lichen checklists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of lichen checklists[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This old article is a list of external links. It violates the WP:NOTLINKFARM directive and is doing no service at all to our readers. Most of the links are dead, or link to archived pages. Those archived links are connecting to out-of-date information, since taxonomies have changed radically in recent years, and new species are being added to country lists all the time. We, the members of the lichen task force, suggest it be deleted. MeegsC (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the dead links and archives aren't really serving a purpose at this point in time. I agree with the deletion request. Oaktree b (talk) 16:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Lists. Skynxnex (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This isn't even an article, but there isn't an obvious speedy deletion criterion to apply. --RL0919 (talk) 17:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.