Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Babar Azam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Babar Azam. Editorial decision whether to merge or not, no clear consensus either way from the relatively-small number of participants below. Daniel (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of international cricket centuries by Babar Azam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The consensus about such lists is that they should at least have a minimum of 25 centuries in international format WP:NLIST. -Lesenwriter (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into main article. Nigej (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and not merge to player article per WP:NOTSTATS as per three most recent discussions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Michael Atherton, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Tom Latham, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Dinesh Chandimal. Ajf773 (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. No issues with inclusion in the main subject article, per WP:NOTSTATS and WP:SPLIT. Lists of international centuries, by definition, have the necessary context and explanation so do not fail NOTSTATS in this regard. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - note to closing admin - there was a RfC on this and the consensus on WP:CRIC was to remove these statistics from bios per WP:NOTSTATS. Störm (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not true: "There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles." _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unnecessary stats like this might be summarised in a prose section, possibly with a very short summary table, but this sort of detail simply takes over articles. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - better make redirect to Babar Azam and not necessary to merge since we have already reached a consensus not to include the list of centuries scored or 5 wicket hauls taken in the biographical articles of the cricketers. Abishe (talk) 08:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Recent discussions have resulted in "merge" (Martyn, Hafeez), "redirect and merge if anyone wants to" (Atherton, Latham, Chandimal), or "redirect but no consensus to merge" (Guptill, Ali). Nowhere is there consensus not to merge, and that is explicit in the closing statements. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is not established, clearly, and with one delete argument and the comment about the RfC, I don't feel comfortable just closing this as "don't delete but figure it out elsewhere".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to AFD closer recent afds were closed as Merge - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Faf du Plessis (2nd nomination); Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Marvan Atapattu; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Cheteshwar Pujara, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Michael Hussey; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Desmond Haynes; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Colin Cowdrey; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Martin Crowe; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Wally Hammond; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Justin Langer Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following also resulted in DELETE: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Mushfiqur Rahim, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Upul Tharanga and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Shakib Al Hasan while these following articles resulted in redirection to player's article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Michael Atherton, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Tom Latham, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Dinesh Chandimal. With all of these lists of centuries or five-wicket hauls for players we are getting mixed outcomes. Admin needs to allow greater discussions (longer than a week) on all AfD's without resulting to arbitrary outcomes. Ajf773 (talk) 08:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect To the main article. I am not sure if there would be a need to dedicate a separate section on main article about these particular statistics. Krao212 (talk) 02:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.