Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of improv games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - OR problems will not be resolved by merging this. WjBscribe 01:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of improv games

Original research. Article has been tagged as unreferenced since 2006, which leads one to believe that this list is largely unverifiable. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. These would be better suited on one of the improv wikis. Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 01:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not an instruction manual and this borders on indiscriminate as well. Some are cited, but most are not. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 01:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of WP:NOT. Acalamari 01:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge. I must agree with Mr.Z-man and Acalamari in their remarks that there is evidence of original research. However, I still believe that this is a list worth keeping. Anyone who is looking for information on improvisational games will surely look here. If nothing else, I suggest merging this into Improvisational theatre. Sens08 02:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A waste of space essentially. Not a good list to have. Jmlk17 03:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyvio from its one cited source. DMacks 03:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I deleted it before realising there were clean non-copyvio versions in the history. I have restored only the non-copyvio versions. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-20 10:09Z
  - Mega-apologies for not looking deeper into the history. 12:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 08:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge into improve comedy, as a list would be helpful to the subject. Links, individual or as a collection, to outside sites that do list what the games entail would also be helpful for an individual to understanding the subject. After all, examples should be included. And it probably wouldn't be long before somebody created the list again. JQF • Talk • Contribs 02:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.