Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hound packs of New Zealand
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
List of hound packs of New Zealand[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of hound packs of New Zealand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTN. Not a single notable entry and no evidence of notability of group. Similar discussion for UK related list is in progress:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bloodhound packs of the United Kingdom Ajf773 (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Lists, and New Zealand. Ajf773 (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete pointless stub list of non-notable things. Dronebogus (talk) 06:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nothing remotely notable. The main article on Beagling contains enough basic information about Beagling in New Zealand and could be expanded.NealeWellington (talk) 08:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable and doesn't meet WP:GNG.— NZFC(talk)(cont) 03:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per everything above. FalconK (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.