Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hammered dulcimer builders
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 04:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List of hammered dulcimer builders[edit]
- List of hammered dulcimer builders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems an unnecessarily specific list of people that primarily has red links. Perhaps it would be better as a category (WP:PAGEDECIDE), or simply deleted. iComputerSaysNo 23:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have no agree with the nominator, the list seems rather unneccesary and full of redlinks. JayJayWhat did I do? 02:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Too many redlinks, not enough notability. Besides, how do we know they were drunk when they made the dulcimers? Clarityfiend (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the nominator. Delete the page and add Category:Hammered dulcimer makers containing the few working articles. - ʈucoxn\talk 05:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.