Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of governed cryptocurrencies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of governed cryptocurrencies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of one notable currency does not a list make. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Already listed at List of cryptocurrencies. Clearly no need for a spinout. Not opposed to a redirect. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CFORK of List of cryptocurrencies. Ajf773 (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Now we have more gryptocurrencies that are governed, that are top12 in coinmarkectcap, like EOS, Cardano, Iota e.t.c. Governed cryptocurrencies is a upcoming special category of cryptos, that have a budget system. Demohere (talk) 08:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Demohere And List of cryptocurrencies exists for that. Also see this discussion regarding CoinMarket. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not all coins are the same. Not all metals are the same, not all stones are the same. It is very importat to mention the properties of each coin. Governance is a specific property. If you allow this property to be mentioned in the list of cryptocurrencies, then it is ok with me... Actually I will add it right now. Demohere (talk) 12:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I cant!!! You have locked the list_of_cryptocurrencies article!!! This is censorship. Demohere (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That article is not locked, it is "semi-protected" against frequent spam by freshly-made accounts or IP users, you can start editing it as soon as your account will reach necessary qualification, which should only take few days and few constructive edits.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 03:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thats why List_of_governed_cryptocurrencies is needed. Your censorship causes that need. Demohere (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And if you dont trust coinmarketcap, go search to any other crypto prices site you want. All of them almost agree eachother after all. Which means that you can distinguish the notable coins, from the non notable ones. Demohere (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Demohere It's not about what we as individual editors think but long established consensus about what reliable sources are. Neither of the links you've listed meet the criteria that would sufficiently support notability. You need to tone down your hostility, like your edit below as well. Please also read what Wikipedia is not and lay off the cry of censorship. If you want to write about non-notable content, get a blog. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think coinmarketcap is non notable. Neither crypto revolution is non notable. You are the non notable one. Demohere (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Demohere Well then I guess it's a good thing there isn't an article about me. Why don't you stick to the discussion at hand? Thanks. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per rationales given above. Q ^{T C} 17:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You state in your personal page that you are taking a long break from wikipedia. What made you break your break and come here to vote for this article to be deleted? You behavior is utterly strange, and suspicious Demohere (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unwanted, needless fork of the content that exists at List of cryptocurrencies. Nick (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this is correct, but you HAVE to allow a new column "governance" to be added in the List of cryptocurrencies. Demohere (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - same reason as per other comments, there's already List of cryptocurrencies which can be used for same exact purpose.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 03:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It can be used IF YOU ALLOW a governance column. So please unlock the article, so that I can add this column. Demohere (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Demohere:, I'd encourage you to avoid viewing this as a negotiation or set of demands. This discussion is focused on whether the discussed article is viable on its own. On the whole, it sounds like most of the participants in this discussion have been pretty receptive to including the information in the other article, so there's no need to raise tensions. As User:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom pointed out, the semiprotection qualification is very lax, and you should reach autoconfirmed status in the next day or so. In the mean time, you can still view the source text and start working on a draft in your sandbox or post-the new table on the article talk page and use {{edit semi-protected}} to request someone else to make addition (as described here). MarginalCost (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.