Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gentrified neighborhoods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of gentrified neighborhoods[edit]

Unsourced original research and listcruft of the worst kind. MartinDK 10:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, original research and biased. Punkmorten 14:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, no lead paragraph, no attempt to explain what a "gentrified neighborhood" is, no inclusion criteria listed whatsoever - this all adds up to no article. Arkyan  ^(talk) 15:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, per nom --Bill.matthews 16:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete absurdly short and incomplete list; a good one might work if there were some sources, but better to start over. (& "Gentrified neighborhoods" might be a usable category) DGG 16:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regular-strength delete (no extra strength needed for this one). Gentrification covers this topic with better sources. The list doesn't explain how or why those neighborhoods were gentrified, and there's no inclusion criteria listed either. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no context, list is incomplete and US-centric article.--JForget 00:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete list would be endless--Sefringle^Talk 22:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.