Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay and bisexual people in video games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of gay and bisexual people in video games[edit]

Article is not noteworthy and has no real use. Most of the information displayed is debatable at the least and unverified. Removing the factually questionable material would leave a short list of little use to the Wikipedia user. Wolf ODonnell 11:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because there isn't a single source on the article, and a lot of it appears to be original research. jd || talk || 11:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what do you know, someone beat me to the nomination. this article is full of "suspected to be gay" entries. I only see about three that are known homosexuals. --Philo 13:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete better covered in Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender characters in video and computer games (although that article has its flaws too). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 19:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's OR, which is not allowed. TJ Spyke 22:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Part unmaintainable list, part original research. Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue for outing video game characters. -- IslaySolomon | talk 03:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Besides the fact that its OR, do we really need to see what sexuality some characters are? We don't care!!! Also, this article opens itself up to vandalism. guitarhero777777 17:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 17:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete many issues with this article. Andre (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Rubbish. Too many "presumably gay" entries. And many entries don't state all the facts (for instance Asuka Kasen later goes on to say sleeping with men is just business). Garrett^Talk 23:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Seems to be 100% original research. The Kinslayer 10:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - That's not a notable article. -- Sensenmann 16:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.