Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former logos used by Mpix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#G7 (one author who has requested deletion) per Musimax's reply to Shawn in Montreal. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of former logos used by Mpix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP is not a image gallery, and this fork is only used to facilitate the usage of non-free content. ViperSnake151 19:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: as the creator of this page, I think it warrants its own article, I think the articles content is notable and should stay, so I don't think deleting the article is the right approach and if it was merged into the Mpix article, I think it would make the article messy and busy. So I think it should stay as is. musimax. (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NFCC and WP:NFC, non-free images are specifically prohibited from being used in lists or galleries, and this article is nothing more than a combination of both. Blatant fair-use abuse. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think the historical logos are very relevant to the Mpix article, helping readers identify the company. If that article was getting too long, it could be convenient to promote long sections of it into new articles. However, that's not the case right now. I don't think there's any need to have this separate list right now. — Ksero (talk | contribs) 21:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete aside from the non-free content issues it just seems unlikely that it will be possible to give the topic an encyclopaedic treatment, how much coverage did the relatively minor changes to this company's logo actually receive. Looking at the current version of the main Mpix all the content is already included there anyway. Guest9999 (talk) 21:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per cogent rationale given above by IllaZilla (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not Wikimedia Commons. All these logos appear in the main article. If the editor does not like their appearance, then I suggest improving the layout of the page, and/or linking to a Wikimedia Commons page where all these logos can appear if they are not found to be in violation of image policy. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As a note, the images were not included in the Mpix article first, they were added by the AfD nominator after I made my comment on how it would look. Taking a look at it now, it doesn't look so bad and I would be fine with the article being deleted. musimax. (talk) 15:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.