Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Ring of Honor personnel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of Ring of Honor personnel. Daniel (talk) 09:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of former Ring of Honor personnel[edit]

List of former Ring of Honor personnel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if anything in Category:Lists of professional wrestling personnel is encyclopedic. But at the very list it makes little sense to have this and List of Ring of Honor personnel. Either delete due to very poor referencing (WP:V) and dubious connection with WP:NLIST or merge to the main list. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I think the alumni article is very WP:LISTCRUFT. While WWE is very big, there is a clear criteria: people under contract. Since ROH it was an independent promotion, many of them are just random wrestlers who worked a few dates with the promotion. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that the page should stay, but I think that the page should be reorganized in the same way that WWE's & Impact Wrestling's List of former personnel pages are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B23F:BA41:0:A:3073:8501 (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any policy-based arguments on what should happen with this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 03:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.