Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. Note recent AFD, and commenters below are correct that there is not a credible claim this is a copyvio. Such lists must have creative selection and/or arrangement in order to be copyrightable. This has neither. postdlf (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of films with a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COPYVIO of Top 100 Movies Of All Time at RottenTomatoes.com. AldezD (talk) 03:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note—Article may list a movie that has since been removed from source (Top 100 Movies Of All Time), but this was [at one time] a copy & paste of work from RottenTomatoes.com. AldezD (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close This was recently kept just last month with a clear keep. Copyvio my ass. A list of film titles isn't copyrighted. An admin please close this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note—This article is a copy & paste of the list published at the source, then alphabetized. Three other references verify data in the lead, and there are additional refs in the list back to RottenTomatoes for movies that have since been added to their "100% fresh" list after this article was originally copied. AldezD (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AldezD: so in that case we should delete AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies and every other one as a copyvio?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close This was debated just last month and there wasn't a single "delete". It satisfies notability therefore there is nothing further for AfD to discuss. If the nominator has copyvio concerns then he should follows the protocolas outlined at WP:DCV. Betty Logan (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.