Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films featuring independent body parts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of films featuring independent body parts[edit]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a repository of loosely-associated topics. That a film has an "independent body part" in it is nowhere near sufficient to justify this article. Otto4711 03:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 23:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 23:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Loose association, movies with indepedant body parts?--Dacium 06:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Just too vague. But not quite as vague as the gory death I just voted against. It feels more like catering to a fetish than a good WP article. Per nom. --Pig^man_{Talk to me} 06:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just no. JuJube 07:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I like it, but I also think it is indiscriminate. Delete per nom. Ohconfucius 07:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yet another "List of films with/featuring/involving/by whatever" that amounts to an indiscriminate list. Furthermore the "independent body parts" is confusing and vague - what precisely is that supposed to mean? Arkyan 18:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The criteria for inclusion are too broad ("featuring"). -- Black Falcon 21:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Hoverfish Talk 08:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep after tightening up the intro and probably renaming the article. This topic is of significant interest to horror fans, but the article needs clarity. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 18:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.