Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional military brats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional military brats[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTCRITERIA. List of military brats is already up for Afd. This is one step below that. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What makes this list pass WP:LISTN? I have no clue. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- More a question of WP:LISTPURP and WP:CLN; is this a useful way of indexing articles on notable fictional characters? See Category:Fictional military brats. postdlf (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've gone and nominated the category for deletion too, per WP:CATDEFINING. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No meaningful connection between these characters. Reywas92^Talk 18:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has too many redlinks and non-articles entries to be justified. Another telling thing is that in the example of Lois Lane, we have only the use of primary sources, we need to source articles to secondary sources. In this case that would be articles that explain how this trait is important for a character and of note. If we have to dig into the actual fictional works themselves we are categorizing by trivial characteeristics. In the case of Lois Lane it is not even a characteristic that is true of every version of Lois Lane. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - GizzyCatBella🍁 06:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.