Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fiction set in Chicago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of fiction set in Chicago[edit]

Hopelessly indiscriminat elist of trivia. Full of red links and original research ("uses Chicago as a foil for a fictitious Iowa city"), not to mention a total lack of refs. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I respectfully disagree with the nominator's categorizing of this list. As I see it, this list is actually comprehensive (although I had to add "Robin and the 7 Hoods" to the Film section -- how could they forget that?). The OR can easily be cleaned up, but I don't see the point in completely erasing it. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a useful list that could be cleaned up and improved, but shouldn't be deleted. BRMo (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and clean up per above NewYork483 (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Where else can you find this information at a glance?Kdammers (talk) 01:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Categorise doesn't seem to add anything a category with subcategories wouldn't. Guest9999 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.