Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous parents of twins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of famous parents of twins

Pointless, unsourced list. The people on it aren't even famous for having twins, they are just famous people who happen to be the parents of twins as well. I cannot fathom any possible use for this list. -Elmer Clark 08:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Oh, and triplets, too. Guess "Famous parents of quadruplets" is a different article. Listcruft - out!!! --Brianyoumans 08:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, yep, should be a category in my opinion. --Snarius 08:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it's not worthy of even that. -Elmer Clark 08:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Listcruft and I vote no on the category as well. If the having of twins created some significant or notable impact on these individual's lives then it would be referenced in their article. 205.157.110.11 08:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Make it a Category:Parents of twins if it's that important. --Dennette 11:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no need for a category either I feel. Dlyons493 Talk 11:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pure listruft. Th ε Halo ^Θ 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as - unencyclopaedic, collection of indiscriminate information, whatever. WilyD 16:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an encyclopedical listing of information. I don't have much use for it either, but then again, I don't have too much use for many, many articles contained on Wikipedia that I don't care for. Just because you don't have use for the information is not grounds for deletion. --Pinkkeith 21:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unencyclopaedic and irrelevent --T-rex 23:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - listcruft WP:LC User:Yy-bo 20:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this information should also be cleared from List of famous twins where it has recently ben added. Musaabdulrashid 06:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just having famous in the title makes it POV-problematic. And although it is true that Wikipedia contains a lot of stuff nobody cares about it is also everyone's responsibility to cut down on the cruft. We are not People magazine. Besides the list will inevitably either list only american movie stars or grow so uselessly big that no one will ever read it. Pascal.Tesson 23:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rename to "Famous people who have twins" or something like this. – Alensha ^talk 18:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see how that's any improvement? -Elmer Clark 20:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.