Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of error codes and messages used on Microsoft Windows-based platforms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of error codes and messages used on Microsoft Windows-based platforms[edit]
- List of error codes and messages used on Microsoft Windows-based platforms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not software user manual. Twri (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom plus it seems a pretty useless list. MadScot (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Anakinjmt (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article is a user manual article, and very poor one at that. PHARMBOY (TALK) 23:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could be very useful content, but delete because Wikipedia is not a Microsoft manual. (Would Wikibooks take this?) Stifle (talk) 13:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; Wikibooks might be an interesting place for this sort of thing, but simple reproductions of published documentation doesn't need to be covered here. Warren -talk- 23:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTMANUAL. ¢Spender1983 (talk) 23:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.