Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of educational institutions in Namakkal
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- List of educational institutions in Namakkal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a list of external links to schools in Namakkal which is really poorly formatted that reads like an advertisement for Namakkal. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion to reach a clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - only because there are corresponding articles for all other districts, per Template:Education in Tamil Nadu —МандичкаYO 😜 03:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Promotional, poorly formatted, largely unreferenced, not even nearly complete and may contain original research, but there is nothing here that cannot be fixed. With many other articles on the very same topic, it is notable enough to remain in the mainspace. — Yash! (Y) 15:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - The list article can be fixed. The article does not read as an advertisement. Gmcbjames (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.