Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of destinations served by Manchester Airport Terminal 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This is due to the larger consensus for keep, and the unreasonable arguments made by the two delete supporters. Airport destinations aren't random trivia and this page will most probably be updated as the main page was before. Rudget 17:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC) note per this DRV, this close has been overturned and the article relisted at AFD. Spartaz Humbug! 18:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of destinations served by Manchester Airport Terminal 2[edit]
- List of destinations served by Manchester Airport Terminal 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No reason to remove this from the main article much less to have three articles. Vegaswikian 22:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as random trivia. Biruitorul 00:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Needs cleanup but otherwise clutters the main article. Regan123 00:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I think standard practice is to list all airlines in a single airport together, regardless of different terminals within the airport. The information, as such, is worth keeping. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete you don't need to have a list of destinations served by an airport... that is subject to change.Balloonman 07:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep and Delist - in a recent peer review editors were told to shorten the article by sectioning the terminal destinations into other pages. Rudget Contributions 13:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Rudget. Commercial airport articles should have destinations by terminal as has become standard. If the editors are following the direction of learned editors from a peer review, who are we to slap them in the face with this AfD. This is a prime example of why Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy is official policy. I wouldn't be oppsed to creating a List of destinations served by Manchester Airport article and merging all the terminal destination articles into that.--Oakshade 23:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I recommended daughter lists being split off in the peer review. Merging the three lists into one is a good idea as well.--BirgitteSB 20:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.