Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer and video games that use Bink video

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted. Will contact the author to see if they want the content moved to their Sandbox in order to categorise the articles accordingly. (aeropagitica) (talk) 07:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of computer and video games that use Bink video[edit]

According to WIkipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a directory and I think this article is a directory of software that use Bink Video. Orbit One ^[Talk|Babel] 22:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete concur with nomination. —ptk✰fgs 22:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and catagorise as much as I like non-raw lists, and this one has information within that cannot be detailed in catagories (at the moment), this list will almost never be complete, given the popularity of bink video. As such, it would be more easily maintained as a catagory. LinaMishima 23:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 07:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per LinaMishima. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 08:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and catagorise per LinaMishima. I am the original author of this article, and, although I admit I was rather fond of it, it appears that a consensus has been reached. I like LinaMishima's suggestion to catagorise, possibly something like "Category:Computer and video games that use Bink video". Whatever you think. Green451 01:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, but primarily because I think this information, if it's really necessary, should be contained to a list rather than having a huge category with potentially hundreds of titles (just judging from the official site's list, which is by its own admission, incomplete), just to avoid the overhead of a huge growing category that I'm not sure even really needs to be created. At least as a list, it's a somewhat justifiable fork of the Bink video article. --SevereTireDamage 22:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are going to be lots of non-notable game without their own articles, also it needs to be able to list info such as if only a specific platform used bink. Ace of Sevens 00:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The list is a directory of software. OrbitOne 15:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, listcruft. Pavel Vozenilek 20:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.