Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of churches in Lisburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of churches in Lisburn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Over 80 churches in one town is quite impressive, however only one of those is notable, the rest are not. Article fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY Ajf773 (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Spiderone 09:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. One notable entry doesn't make for a good list. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. the purpose of an article such as this is to serve instead of making individual articles. this is intended to be an inclusive list,not a selective list, and the rules that thei ndividual entities have to be notable do not apply. the intention is that the items get eventually expanded. DGG ( talk ) 01:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lists also should not be indiscriminate nor serve as a directory. Ajf773 (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see how the lack of this list would result in individual articles for the non-notable churches. Hallmark example of NOTDIRECTORY. Reywas92^Talk 20:54, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.