Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in the Halloween film series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in the Halloween film series

Article contains descriptions of characters that appear in only one movie or are minor characters part of a subplot. Article contains multiple issue tags that have remained for over 1 year without resolution. Character profiles for the four main reoccurring characters (Michael Myers, Samuel J. Loomis, Laurie Strode, Jamie Lloyd) already exist. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep consistent with treatment of other film series, e.g. List of Saw characters. JJL (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is consistant treatment of most film and television series. Futher, no valid reason for deletion has been given. Edward321 (talk) 00:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. We have plenty of precedents for these sort of articles--feel free to go through with a chainsaw (sorry, wrong franchise) to take out the parts that don't belong and then improve what's left, but I see no reason to delete the article. Jclemens (talk) 06:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The standard compromise way to do it to avoid having individual articles on all of them. Sourcing to the primary work should be done, & will be sufficient.If we do not compromise about things like this, we'll be fighting over these articles indefinitely. DGG (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.