Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus companies of the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of bus companies of the Philippines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list does not meet MOS:LIST, as less reliable sources and most of them are original research - Jjpachano (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of links to Wikipedia articles, making this a valid navigational list. Navigational lists are far more useful than categories since more information can be listed, helping people find what they are looking for. Remove anything that doesn't have its own article or a section in another article. Dream Focus 18:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are plenty of blue linked entries. Article can be improved by clearing out the unsourced, non-notable entries. Ajf773 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valid list but needs TLC though. I'll give it a go. --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep Enough blue links to justify the existence of this list. Agletarang (talk) 11:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.