Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of beat 'em ups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Proto///type 15:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of beat 'em ups[edit]

There's no article here. If done correctly, it will effectively be a duplicate of <<Category:Beat 'em ups>>. I'd support a re-direct. Ace of Sevens 00:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete list cruf (I changed the text in the nom to remove the category template) --Pboyd04 00:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- Mikeblas 02:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as listcruft, made redundant due to Category:Beat 'em ups--TBCTaLk?!? 02:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant to category. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, redundant to a category. TheJC ^Talk_{Contributions} 08:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Made redundant by the category, but would be worth keeping if it were turned into an article discussing the format, history and style of beat 'em ups. Oh, wait, there already is one. Delete. Seb Patrick 09:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; lists are useful when they do things categories can't, but this one doesn't and therefore isn't. — Haeleth Talk 13:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant, pointless, et cetera WilyD 16:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Purely and simpley because lists are NOT redundent to categories. Note to closing admin, this vote probably violates wiki:point. Thought I'd mention it before anyone else did. 88.107.129.242 18:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC) (oops, not signed in, sorry, "Jcuk")[reply]
Delete per nom. Zos 18:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 23:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 20:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Redundant, completely redundant. --Tachyon01 23:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Beat 'em up. If this info should be in wikipedia, I think it should go here. Green caterpillar 02:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above, please. We don't want this one standing up again. Shenme 03:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep categories are not a replacements for lists, especially those that contain red links. Grue 13:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.