Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards won by Marathi people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards won by Marathi people[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t understand why such a list has been made. Ok fine, the person is Marathi and he won some award somewhere. Why do we have to have a list of all such award clubbed together just because the person is Marathi? Such vanity list is a overcategorization and useless and unencyclopedic. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable intersection. Too broad of a topic. What next? List of Bengalis who like apple pies? Direct quote from WP:LISTCRITERIA: "When establishing membership criteria for a list, ask yourself if the following are true: If this person/thing/etc., wasn't an X, would it reduce their fame or significance?". A Tamil Sachin Tendulkar would have still won the Bharat Ratna, as would have a Bengali Lata Mangeshkar. utcursch | talk 14:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well said! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Indiscriminate collection of information, totally pointless. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obviously too wide a subject to become both sensibly collected and also maintained thus nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.