Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of auxiliary Interstate Highways unconnected with Parent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of auxiliary Interstate Highways unconnected with Parent[edit]

Why does this matter? NE2 13:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It doesn't. Max ^{- You were saying?} 14:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The auxiliary numbering scheme allows for highways connected via another auxiliary route. The list as a whole is not particularly meaningful. All this information can be noted on the relevant auxiliary route articles. --Polaron | Talk 15:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete useless listcruft ff m 16:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, roadgeekery of no significance. The article doesn't even mention the non-standard mile-markers on I-117, so it's obviously incomplete. --Dhartung | Talk 19:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Now THAT's a good word... "roadgeekery". Even I, a proud road geek, find this list to be of no use. At first, it appeared to be a list of those highways that encircle a major city to bypass the through-town traffic, but it's highways that meet a definition that most travelers would not notice, and it's narrowed further because it "does not include Interstates that violate the numbering rules, such as I-278, I-678, or I-238". Mandsford 21:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete meaningless list. This is not how the Interstate Highway system works, and this information should be noted in the individual auxiliary Interstate articles. —O (说 • 喝) 21:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments. It is not uncommon for an auxiliary interstate to connect to its parent via another "sibling" spur, and there's no need to have a list of the ones that do this. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 05:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 06:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decomission - erm Delete: per above master son^{T - C} 12:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of auxiliary Interstates unconnected with a Parent Interstate- just found this. Should this get deleted as well? --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.