Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airlines of Bermuda
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- List of airlines of Bermuda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page only has one thing in it's table with close to no info at all. The company shown does not have a wikipedia page. Wilbysuffolk talk 03:12, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Part of the complete List of airlines, deletion damages the encyclopedic coverage of the subject.--Arxiloxos (talk) 14:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No point in creating essentially a redirect. The link in List of airlines can easily be piped directly to the single airline in the list. It's a formatting issue of List of airlines.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Lists with one item on the list that have a reason are ok. No purpose to disorganizing the encyclopedia just to save a page of paper that doesn't exist. Unscintillating (talk) 04:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well this is different. Do we have any precedent or applicable guidelines for lists like this (is this even still a "list")?--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all the lists of airlines by country that have only one or a handful of airlines into a single list. These lists have navigational value but this value is diluted by having the content strewn over multiple pages, and a list with only a few items isn't much of a list. Reyk YO! 11:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball Watcher 01:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Closer should review discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airlines of Greenland. Unscintillating (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Arxiloxos's rationale. Seems to be a perfectly logical list, even if short. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.