Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yusuke Oeda pupils
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 20:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of Yusuke Oeda pupils[edit]
- List of Yusuke Oeda pupils (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable. As the intro says, a list of pupils who have been taught by Yusuke Oeda in the game of Go. Yusuke Oeda is apparently important in the game, but that doesn't mean his students, or a list of them, are. Saikokira 01:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge If this list is worthy of mention (which is not evident) then at best it could be part of the article Yusuke Oeda. Signed Jeepday 02:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MSJapan 03:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability is not associative. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-12 14:52Z
- Delete as non-notable, although a category to be used for notable Go players who were his students might be interesting and appropriate. -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think we need an expert here, as he apparently is one of the highest ranked players in the world, if I understand Go_ranks_and_ratings correctly. Having such a teacher might make a player notable enough to be on a list. DGG 00:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It would be preferable if the information on this page were moved over to the main article on Yusuke Oeda, famed Go professional and teacher. I would prefer that to be done before the page was deleted. It does look pretty non notable to me.--ZincBelief 11:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Yusuke Oeda. The list is incomprehensive in content. All the "pupils" are in red link except for three. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 23:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.