Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wests Tigers players
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. Non-admin Closure. DARTH PANDAduel 20:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Wests Tigers players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested WP:PROD. Indiscriminate list. My rationale is under list item 4 under WP:INDISCRIMINATE. MuZemike (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is better in this article than a sprawling list in the main Wests Tigers article. Given that players listed here play in the top level rugby league competition in Australia. Michellecrisp (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Patently not indiscriminate. Daft nomination. Hesperian 01:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'll admit that the list isn't finished (two columns are blank), but if you honestly think that this isn't worthy at all, then you're setting a very dangerous precedent whereby hundreds of other lists including dozens of featured lists should be deleted under the same rationale. MDM (talk) 03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC) (article creator).[reply]
- Keep List of first grade players at one of the 28 biggest Rugby League clubs in the world. If it included all the players in the junior ranks or something silly like that then it would be a indiscriminate. Mattlore (talk) 03:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You know what, fuck this fucking shit! MuZemike (talk) 04:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please be WP:CIVIL in this discussion.Mattlore (talk) 05:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per PROD reasons, and per MDM. If this is deleted, then it will most likely be created again. The Windler talk 05:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Mattlore, not in fact an indiscriminate list. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep as per all. Wonderful list of fabulous players for a superb club. Though I may be biased. •Florrie•leave a note• 12:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No real difference in style between this list and that of many other sports teams here at wikipedia. It is a real decent article.Londo06 13:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note — Withdrawn. And I echo what I said above. MuZemike (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.