Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. RL0919 (talk) 13:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list does not pass WP:NLIST and the WP:OVERQUOTING is a violation of WP:CV. TipsyElephant (talk) 03:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Radio, and Lists. TipsyElephant (talk) 03:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: I've seen worse. I would rather see some edits made correcting the quoting issues (which I don't think rise to the level of CopyVio, not even borderline CopyVio, IMO), refining some of the sources (there are plenty, it's a popular podcast), and working with the other editors via the talk page. Make some attempt at improving first. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutralhomer: What do you think about draftification? I don't know if the list should be kept in mainspace, considering the possible copyright issues, and draftspace could give the article some time to be developed and sourced. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 09:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148: I'd be OK with that. With the normal messages sent to WP:PODCAST, WP:RADIO, and WP:WPRS asking for their input. I think between the three projects, they can bring this back mainspace status. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 17:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per comments above. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify The issue is with how the article is written; it overuses quotations from Nightvale. If the quotations are removed or replaced this would resolve the issue. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.