Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Warcraft locations (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 12:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Warcraft locations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted as gamecruft in 2007, was recreated and is still exactly the same gamecruft now. Entirely WP:OR & WP:GAMEGUIDE list, and already exists in WoW Wiki here so nothing of value would be lost if it was deleted again. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOR and WP:GAMECRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 04:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Warcraft as already traswikied material lacking an assertion of encyclopedic notability. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is redirected, it should be redirected to it's settings' section with some extended detail about the major locations in this franchise. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Ajf773, not much more to say. -- ferret (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GAMECRUFT and failure of WP:GNG. Even if sources were found, it'd probably be a WP:TNT type situation, as it's written entirely by a in-universe perspective, rather than a real-world, encyclopedic one. Sergecross73 msg me 14:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as G4, seeing that the nomination rationale in the previous AfD is similar to this one, and, like the nom said, the fact that the page was deleted for pretty much the same reasons suggests that this page is a recreation. --TL22 (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It very well could have been back in 2014 when the page was recreated with no rationale, but no one caught it. I think people frown on speedying pages so long after they are recreated and edited._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:GAMECRUFT, WP:LISTCRUFT. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - complete WP:GAMECRUFT, full of WP:OR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.