Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Uttarakhand government departments
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Government of Uttarakhand. v/r - TP 13:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- List of Uttarakhand government departments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List of non-notable governmental departments which does not meet WP:SAL and also WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTWEBHOST. External links for to dsome of the department's websites were in appropriately mebedded into the article, but I removed these per WP:ELLIST, WP:EL#cite_note-7 and WP:CS#Avoid embedded links. I cannot think of any way to bring this article up to Wikipedia's standards which does not involve adding relevant sourced commentary about each of these departments, and I do not think that is a viable option at all. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 June 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Government of Uttarakhand. No need for this stand alone list. Ajf773 (talk) 03:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect as suggested above; fails WP:LISTN. Clearly excessive & belongs on the org's web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.