Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK number-one singles of 2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of UK number-one singles of 2012

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is redundant to information already listed in two places in Wikipedia. There is no need to supply this information a third time when it is already summarized and listed at List of 2010s UK Singles Chart number ones#2012 and 2012 in British music#Number-one singles. This is an example of a WP:CFORK. A redirect is an alternative here but my attempt at that was reverted. The only reasoning I could get from the page's creator is that if US music charts are going to have redundant lists, so should the UK. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As long as efforts are made to fully reference the number ones on every [Year] in British music pages, it is fine to merge. 03 md 14:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since is a discussion on the 2012 list, all sources have been merged to the list of number-one singles in 2012 in British music. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 11:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.