Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Today's Special episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Today's Special episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not very helpful or necessary. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this just contains the episode titles themselves, and most of them are generic titles like "Soup", "Fruit", "Pianos" and "Sam". Episode lists are permitted on Wikipedia if they contain useful information — plot summaries, director/writer credits, specific airdates, ratings data, and on and so forth — but there's not much point in just listing hopelessly generic and uninformative episode titles with no corollary content at all. No prejudice against recreation in the future in the (rather unlikely) event that a more useful version can be created — but this, as constituted, is pointless. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearcat. I couldn't have said it better. ~EdGl! 01:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete entirely per Bearcat - See no point in repeating what he's said so wont bother. –Davey2010^Talk 03:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.