Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stick Cricket versions
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Stick Cricket versions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:VG/GL - Game articles should not include exhaustive version histories, let alone stand-alone articles. Or, from a WP:N perspective, the version history is not a notable subject. Marasmusine (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Marasmusine (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable split article of a subject which seems to lack notability itself. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 16:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an article with no notability at all, with non-notable information QueenCake (talk) 17:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I would be tempted to say "merge", but after looking at some contribs and article history, I don't think there is anything verifiable here to merge; it's almost completely original research. MuZemike 00:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is WP:NOT a directory. As per WP:VGSCOPE, we don't need exhaustive lists of version histories. Randomran (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.