Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Singapore Television Channels.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Singapore Television Channels.[edit]

Misinformed creation and inferior dublication of List of Singaporean television channels.--Huaiwei 18:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeant_ie 19:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Forks are bad for the project. -- Natalinasmpf 20:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. — Instantnood 20:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I dont think we need a redirect when the article title includes even a full stop.--Huaiwei 21:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - The edit history of duplicated articles is usually kept. — Instantnood 21:23, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Asking for articles to remain just because of their edit histories is kind of revolutionary as far as I know.--Huaiwei 21:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - From what I read from its edit history [1], this article has twice been moved. Why don't we move it back to Singapore television channels, and keep as a redirect? Quite a few pages are pointing at it. — Instantnood 21:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - If you may apply abit of common sense here, the two page moves were of little historical value to wikipedia, and mind telling us what is the use of having List of Singapore Television Channels. staying when List of Singapore Television Channels does not? Are we expecting lots of people to type "List of Singapore Television Channels." (with the dot) when searching for this article? The only so called "links" to this article is from another re-direct page, Singapore television channels, the later of which is only linked to talk pages, templates, and so forth. What do wikipedia stand to loose? Anyway, I am going to correct the re-direct links.--Huaiwei 22:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - What I am suggesting is to move it back to Singapore television channels, keep the edit history under that title, and make it a redirect to the list of Singaporean television channels. The redirect then left at list of Singapore Television Channels. can be deleted. — Instantnood 00:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Er....I dont know what is the need to do such a complicated set of movements, but as long as useless articles and redirects like this one are removed, I have no comments.--Huaiwei 00:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Alright. Nothing is to be kept under this title. What has to be kept is the edit history of the duplicated article. — Insta ntnood 00:53, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although if someone wants to work out all the redirects and edit histories, more power to them. :) Justin Bacon 01:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no problem with it. --Vsion 04:41, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I just noticed that tralling "." so no need for redirect. Vegaswikian 05:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not seeing the issue with the edit history. MCB 05:30, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Improper title and duplicate. *drew 18:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per reasons above. - Mailer Diablo 12:32, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.