Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shadow Raiders planets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 14:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Shadow Raiders planets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:FANCRUFT, WP:NOT an indescriminate list of things Part Deux 22:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't hurt to redirect it to Shadow Raiders, as there's a list of the planets there too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - nominator gives no deletion rationale, and remember: WP:NOT#PAPER. Topic appears notable enough, merging wouldn't help. Matthew 08:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:FANCRUFT and WP:NOT an indescriminate list of things aren't a rationale? Part Deux 18:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hole in one! "WP:FANCRUFT" and WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE are both opinions, your opinions... hence unsupported by actual clear-cut policy. Matthew 18:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:FANCRUFT and WP:NOT an indescriminate list of things aren't a rationale? Part Deux 18:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 16:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep This isn't really a list, despite its name, so I don't think WP:NOT#DIR applies, and I can't see what in WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE this article would fall under. It is in bad need of sourcing and clean up though, but that's a different matter. Pax:Vobiscum 11:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Each planet looks like it is getttin g an article and they are all linked too from the main page. The Placebo Effect 12:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Topic notable enough. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 06:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.