Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ron and Fez Show characters
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of Ron and Fez Show characters[edit]
- List of Ron and Fez Show characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced list of fans and radio show contributors. Fails to establish notability. Zero reliable sources. Resembles a bad fansite. Not even worth merging to to parent Ron and Fez article. Rtphokie (talk) 00:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No vote, but I would comment that I broke this list out of the Ron and Fez article some years ago because the material therein, which has in the past been much more substantial, was taking up the bulk of the article. Cheers! bd2412 T 01:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- After reviewing the BLP discussion, delete. No one was going to do the work of sourcing this. Cheers again! bd2412 T 01:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Not sourced, not notable, and not encyclopedic. - Dravecky (talk) 04:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dustitalk to me 17:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:Not a source of unnotable 'wacky' morning zoo characters. Only three names have blue links outside the hosts, and most can be described 'cast of thousands'-style in a paragraph within the R&F article. Nate • (chatter) 01:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Last year I asked about sources for this article[1] and none were found.[2] I cut out a large amount of unsourced material about living people, some highly derogatory.[3][4] I doubt that this material could ever be sourced properly. A description of the show and bios of the main hosts are fine, but this article has no hope for growing into something that is verifiable. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.