Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Quranic Du'aas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While the argument to transwiki is not without merit, there is not agreement on which project to send it to and there is a concern that it is copy/paste of another website. There is a clear consensus that this does not belong on Wikipedia, so I am going ahead with deletion. Willing to userfy if anyone wishes to proceed with a transwiki operation to an appropriate target. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Quranic Du'aas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of 90 (yes, 90!) Quranic prayers is not an acceptable subject for an encyclopedic article. This is nothing more than copying the prayers from a religious book. An article explaining the Du'ass with a reference to an external source would be perfectly acceptable and more in keeping with the Wikipedia style. Man way 17:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to Wikisource. This would be a perfect addition to Wikisource, but this is not an encyclopaedia article. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 02:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's clearly copy paste from a book or possibly even an online discussion forum. This could almost have been speedily deleted. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I didn't try. Three times. --Man way 07:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and re-do at Wikibooks. Since it contains original translation (and possibly some annotations) it would not be suitable for Wikisource. It would probably be appropriate at Wikibooks. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This list is really very helpful for the Muslim community. It hasnt simply been copied or pasted . A lot of work was done to compile the list. If you let it stay on wikipedia,it will be very beneficial for the Muslims and the non-muslim community can get read it too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Islamicdua (talk • contribs) 21:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The current title looks to be a valid Wikipedia topic, although the current is more like a book as others have mentioned. So I would suggest a transwiki (not just a delete) and a rewrite on the topic about duaas, with references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki. This is not an encyclopedia article, it's a book. Send it to the correct website. Bearian (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE Looks like the whole 90 prayers has been copied over into Duaas as well. --Man way 15:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.