Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistani Shia Muslims

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistani Shia Muslims

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the entries are because their surname suggests that they might be Shia. Then, there is a possibility that they might not be practicing. As religion is a sensitive issue, so such lists for navigation purpose are not useful. Categories are a better way to go. As such, the list doesn't provide sourcing that they are practicing. Störm (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a list like this needs adequate sourcing, not guessing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE and a non notable cross categorisation. Ajf773 (talk) 09:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --SalmanZ (talk) 20:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:LISTPEOPLE cautions that "Special care must be taken when adding living persons to lists based on religion" - WP:LISTCRITERIA says "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory, repository of links, or means of promotion, and should not contain indiscriminate lists, only certain types of list should be exhaustive. Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence." - Epinoia (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.