Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistan friendship associations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The current version of the article does not appear to satisfy the expressed wishes of the Keep voters, since it contains *no* entries for which there is sourced information to show notability. (The closest one is the Afghan friendship group, which is undergoing its own AfD at present). If we restrict the list to include only those friendship groups for which sources are provided, it would have either no entries or just a single entry. That would not be much of a list. I will provide a version of the article for anyone who wants to work on it in their user space, for adding sources. EdJohnston (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistan friendship associations

This is simply List of non-notable organizations. Per WP:NOT, wikipedia is not an collection of random NN information. The page was prod'd, but the creator has removed prod, so I'm bringing it to AFD. Ragib (talk) 17:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT; specifically, not a directory. This would be better suited to a phone book, or rather a web directory. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and limit to only notable entries. There currently exists a "Friends of Israel" article that no one is about to delete. This article should be kept, minus any unsourced, and superfluous info. Bless sins (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently has no superfluous information ... it is just a list. However, the notability of such associations is questionable, and that's what we are discussing in this AFD. --Ragib (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep provided that sources can be added to the article. --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you mean, despite being Non-notable by themselves, you'd support "keep"? --Ragib (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.