Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PKNA issues

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of PKNA issues (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable list of issues from the comic book PKNA. No indication of stand-alone notability, information or reception. Reads as WP:CATALOG material. Redirect to PKNA. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This list has one source meaning that the information from only that one source makes up the list, you could essentially go to that source to find all the information. Wikipedia articles aren't even supposed to largely rely on one source but this one entirely relies on that one source. Along with this the article doesn't even meet WP:N.Grapefruit17 (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A quick reminder: When commenting stick to the subject at hand. Cite policies and/or guidelines when possible. And please be brief!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.