Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PBS KIDS Channel Identifications
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphim♥Whipp 16:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of PBS KIDS Channel Identifications[edit]
- List of PBS KIDS Channel Identifications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an article-length recreation of material which has been deleted many, MANY times from the PBS Kids article. Additionally, I suspect that it has been created by a sock of blocked user Jamesinc14, which I shall address elsewhere. Regardless of either of these issues, it is patently unencyclopedic and of so little utility as to make my head ache. Gladys J Cortez 21:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The headache is shared and I'm tired of this information being added again and again. Non-notable promocruft from Jamesinc. Nate • (chatter) 00:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This article cites no sources and I can't think of how it passes WP:N. TN‑X-Man 00:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, no sources, likely banned user, etc... Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR, WP:CRUFT. Guy (Help!) 14:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - socking issues aside, this is still a textbook example of listcruft and doesn't have a hope of meeting notability criteria. Wikipedia is not a repository of useless info. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 15:33, May 16, 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Sockpuppetry and listcruft, from a banned sock that refuses to take a hint. -- azumanga (talk) 02:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is indiscriminate trivia with no real encyclopedic value. KleenupKrew (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.