Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nuestra Belleza México special awards
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- List of Nuestra Belleza México special awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sideshow of main event, no independent notability. Unsourced and to my opinion fancruft. The Banner talk 00:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Deleteas Wikipedia should not be a webhost of data the pageant businesses decline to host on their own site. Fails WP:LISTN too as no Reliable Sources engage in this trivia. Legacypac (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- delete completely unencyclopedic list. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.