Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nitrome Limited games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nitrome Limited games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reproduction of site's own content, possibly non-notable, and certain columns are OR Aaaamm (talk) 09:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are 14 separate game reviews on Gamezebo alone, a review for Test Subject Green on GamePro, 6 reviews on indiegames.com, a handful of pieces on Rock, Paper, Shotgun, a metric shitload on Jay is Games. And that's after a limited search. There's no issue with collective notability here, in fact some of these games will be independently notable, but a list like this is a good start. It isn't perfect, and some of the descriptions are on the large side, but it's nothing that editing can't fix. Someone another 00:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Someone another. Seems notable and discriminate. Just needs some editing and attention. Dzlife (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – valid list, looks like notability is established. –MuZemike 17:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As others have said, it needs editing, not deleting. I've done plenty of work on it (before I created this account), but I haven't had the time lately. It would be good if others could help. ...Dynamic|cimanyD... (talk|klat) ☺ 17:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.